Worldie | Depp vs. NGN

Mar. 2013

March 2013

March 2013, it has been hard to keep up and make sense of Ms Heard(cid:182)s evidence.

b. Secondly, Ms Heard fell back on her recent change of accounts from there having been one very striking assault in March 2013, to it be a month of assaults. By re-examination (Trial Day 13, page 2033), Ms Heard was claiming that there were (cid:179)at least three incidents(cid:180) in March 2013, which involved the filming of the Keith Richards documentary.

March 2013

March 2013. The Claimant also disclosed an undated photograph of Ms Heard with Ia(cid:81) McLa(cid:74)a(cid:81), Ke(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75) R(cid:76)c(cid:75)a(cid:85)d(cid:86)(cid:182) (cid:78)e(cid:92)b(cid:82)a(cid:85)d (cid:83)(cid:79)a(cid:92)e(cid:85). 6th July 2020

March 2013

6. M(cid:86) Hea(cid:85)d(cid:182)(cid:86) 1st (cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:81)e(cid:86)(cid:86) (cid:86)(cid:87)a(cid:87)e(cid:80)e(cid:81)(cid:87) (cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:87) (cid:87)(cid:75)e (cid:76)(cid:81)c(cid:76)de(cid:81)(cid:87) (cid:76)(cid:81) (cid:179)March 2013(cid:180): AH 1st at 52

March 2013

8th March 2013

March 2013

8th March 2013

8 March 2013

there were two incidents (one on 8 March 2013 to which the text mentioning the

8 March 2013

there were two incidents (one on 8 March 2013 to which the text mentioning the

9 March 2013

11. AH 5th WS, Ms Heard stated (cid:179)41. O(cid:81) 10 Ma(cid:85)c(cid:75) 2013 I (cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:79)d Ka(cid:87)e ab(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:87) J(cid:82)(cid:75)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:92) (cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74) me after being upset about Tasya. The day after the painting incident (9 March 2013), I sent a text to Kate, telling her (cid:179)The(cid:85)e (cid:90)a(cid:86) l(cid:82)(cid:81)g d(cid:85)a(cid:80)a la(cid:86)(cid:87) (cid:81)igh(cid:87) a(cid:81)d I(cid:182)ll (cid:87)ell he(cid:85) (cid:87)he (cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:92) la(cid:87)e(cid:85)(cid:180). 2.1/71.3/E606.30-31

12 March 2013

text: that text is 12 March 2013.

12 March 2013

3. Amended Defence relied (cid:88)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:81) (cid:179)disco bloodbath(cid:180) (cid:87)e(cid:91)(cid:87) (cid:80)e(cid:86)(cid:86)a(cid:74)e as referring to this incident; and pleaded that the Claimant (cid:179)subsequently(cid:180) (cid:86)e(cid:81)(cid:87) that text referring to that evening. The date of that text is 12 March 2013.

20 March 2013

12. The Claimant disclosed an email between the him and Jane Rose of 20 March 2013 (cid:177) 8/63(a)/I1.1 This email demonstrates that Ms Heard first met Keith Richards on evening of 20 March. 4th July 2020

22 March 2013

15. AH(cid:182)(cid:86) 7th WS at 5: Ms Heard changed the date of the alleged incident in purported reliance on a photograph of lines of cocaine on a kitchen glass table. There is no apparent causal connection, as to why that photo of drugs taken at her house on 22 March 2013 could possibly make Ms Heard change or recall the date of Second Incident.

22 March 2013

20 Finally, the Court should not that at the time, Ms Heard told Nathan Holmes on 22 March 2013 at 12:37 that she was (cid:181)trying to wake(cid:182) Mr Depp [7/1e/H21A.17A], but in cross-examination that M(cid:85) De(cid:83)(cid:83) (cid:82)(cid:81) 22 Ma(cid:85)c(cid:75) (cid:90)a(cid:86) (cid:179)(cid:82)(cid:81) a 24 (cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:85) c(cid:82)(cid:78)e-fueled be(cid:81)de(cid:85)(cid:180) (Transcript, Day 11, page 1810) a(cid:81)d M(cid:86) He(cid:81)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:84)(cid:88)e(cid:86)(cid:182)(cid:86) e(cid:89)(cid:76)de(cid:81)ce (cid:90)a(cid:86) (cid:87)(cid:75)a(cid:87) was in the kitchen (Transcript Day 13, pages 2123-2124).

23 March 2013

Script Notes showing that Mr McLagan was only on set on 23 March 2013.

Aug. 2014

August 2014

8. Fifth Incident: Bahamas detox in August 2014 (ReAmDef �8.a.5)

Oct. 2015

October 2015

8.1. Ms Heard had not (cid:177) at the time of the above exchanges in October 2015 about obtaining evidence from Kate James (cid:177) pleaded guilty to any charge. She was (as recorded in the transcript of the 18 April 2016 hearing) offering to do so as part of a plea bargain.

October 2015

nan

October 2015

8.2. At that time, i.e. October 2015, Ms Heard had every reason to ask someone (whether Kevin Murphy or Kate James) to lie for her in order to strengthen her hand in that plea bargaining, to get the more serious charges dropped (cid:177) and Mr Murphy felt compelled to do so in his declaration of 13 October 2015 [5.1/201(a)/F1303.1-2].

October 2015

4. As the Court transcript records: (cid:179)On 13th of October 2015, Ms Heard provided an unsworn statement to the Prosecution regarding her actions and state of mind relevant

11 October 2015

7.2. When pressed on the documents, including the email at F885 dated 11 October 2015, Ms Heard again denied that she had intended to try to pressure anyone to provide a helpful statement:

13 October 2015

Nov. 2015

November 2015

12. Eleventh Incident: Thanksgiving, November 2015 (Re-Am Def �8.a.14)

November 2015

to the offence, and on 3rd of November 2015, there was an indication that she would plea to the charge that she made the false statement, on the basis that the other two charges were discontinued. This has, in effect, occurred today (cid:171)(cid:180) [F1303.5]

Dec. 2015

December 2015

Depp in December 2015 [2/59B/D227-D231], Ms Heard created a wholly new, but

Apr. 2016

April 2016

17 April 2016

5.1. Ms Heard swore an affidavit the previous day, 17 April 2016, in which she set out matters she relied upon in mitigation, namely blaming others, Kate James and Kevin Murphy, see paras 26-38 [5.1/200/F1229-F1242]. The magistrate in sentencing relied upon that evidence incl(cid:88)ding concl(cid:88)ding (cid:87)ha(cid:87) (cid:179)(cid:171)Ms Heard was unaware of the documentation for the dogs(cid:182) importation into Australia had not been complete(cid:180) [5.1/201(b)/F1303.6].

18 April 2016

1. The Australian criminal proceedings against Ms Heard were concluded on 18 April 2016 when Ms Heard entered a plea of guilty to a summary offence of producing a false or misleading document. A transcript is at [5.1/201(b)/F1303.3-8]. The Court Order of 18 April 2016 is at [5.1/200/F1219-F1220]. A helpful report of those court proceedings from The Guardian, 18 April 2016 is at [11/190/P173-P176].

18 April 2016

5.2. There had been more serious charges, which were dropped. See (i) written submissions of the prosecution dated 18 April 2016 [5.1/200/F1278-F1284] at para 7: (cid:179)the two other charges having been withdrawn and the plea having been proposed at an earlier time(cid:171)(cid:180) F1279 and (ii) the written submissions of Ms Hea(cid:85)d(cid:182)(cid:86) the same date [5.1/200/F1288]. Further, as those submissions on M(cid:86) Hea(cid:85)d(cid:182)(cid:86) behalf made clear, she was relying on a mistake and that staff had obtained permission for the dogs; the Court is invited to read para 8 of those submissions in full [F1289]. Her submissions continued: (cid:179)The details of her belief and the bases for it are described in the sworn declaration of Ms Heard. It is supported by the sworn declaration by Kevin Murph(cid:92), who is the estate manager for Ms Heard(cid:182)s husband, Mr Depp. The Crown does not challenge this evidence.(cid:180) That is a reference to M(cid:86) Hea(cid:85)d(cid:182)(cid:86) affida(cid:89)i(cid:87) and M(cid:85) M(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:83)h(cid:92)(cid:182)(cid:86) decla(cid:85)a(cid:87)ion da(cid:87)ed 13 Oc(cid:87)obe(cid:85) 2015 [5.1/201(a)/F1303.1- 2]

May 2016

of May 2016.

May 2016

28 May 2016 at 6/148E/894.257 (cid:177) F894.259 which Ms Heard states (cid:90)e(cid:85)e (cid:179)photos

May 2016

Sun having previously published (a) an article in May 2016, in which it had reported

May 21, 2016

14. Fourteenth Incident: May 21, 2016 at the Eastern Columbia (Re-AmDef �8(d)-(l))

26 May 2016

26 May 2016 and (cid:177) where they have given evidence (cid:177) references to where that

27 MAY 2016

________________________________________________________________ ANNEX E (cid:55)O CLAIMAN(cid:55)(cid:182)(cid:54) CLO(cid:54)ING (cid:54)KELETON (cid:177) CON(cid:54)IDERA(cid:55)ION OF M(cid:54) HEARD(cid:182)(cid:54) E(cid:57)IDENCE A(cid:55)(cid:55)ENDANCE A(cid:55) (cid:55)HE COURTHOUSE ON 27 MAY 2016 ________________________________________________________________

27 May 2016

1. It was put to Ms Heard that her attendance at the Courthouse on 27 May 2016 was a publicity stunt (cid:177) her attendance being unnecessary (See Transcript, DAY 12, pages 1991-2 of the Transcript):

28 May 2016

28 May 2016 at 6/148E/894.257 (cid:177) F894.259 which Ms Heard states (cid:90)e(cid:85)e (cid:179)photos

Jun. 2016

17 June 2016

4. The form requesting a Temporary Restraining Order was completed on Ms Heard(cid:182)s behalf on 26 Ma(cid:92) 2016. It states, in terms, that upon granting or refusing the TRO application, the Court will schedule a hearing on the petitioner(cid:182)s request (see Section 25 of Form DV-100 [4/111/F646]). The next form in the procedure (DV-109) shows, at Section 4, that any orders granted on the initial request are granted (or refused) until the court hearing [4/111/F667]. Section 5 [on F668] makes it clear that any order made on filing the application is made until the hearing. The hearing was listed for 17 June 2016 [4/112/F677].

Jul. 2016

18 July 2016

66. In short, the contents of the deposition of Officer Saenz on 18 July 2016 [3/87/F43-

18 July 2016

66. In short, the contents of the deposition of Officer Saenz on 18 July 2016 [3/87/F43-

28 July 2016

proceedings and that in respect of the 28 July 2016 deposition, Mr Harrell was

28 July 2016

nan

Aug. 2016

August 2016

she was deposed in August 2016. But her account of her injuries were inconsistent

17 August 2016

that there was no evidence warranting a report of a crime and (b) on 17 August 2016

Mar. 2017

March 2017

2 In March 2017, HHJ Parkes QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge in Lisle-Mainwaring v ANL [2017] EWHC 543 (QB) observed at [62] (cid:179)I(cid:87) ha(cid:86) (cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:90) bec(cid:82)me c(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:89)e(cid:81)(cid:87)i(cid:82)(cid:81)al (cid:87)(cid:82) (cid:85)ec(cid:82)g(cid:81)i(cid:86)e a (cid:181)ceili(cid:81)g(cid:182) f(cid:82)(cid:85) ge(cid:81)e(cid:85)al damages in defamation, which broadly corresponds to the maximum level of damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity in personal injury cases. That figure now appears to be of the order of �300,000 (see Cairns v Modi at [25] and Simmons v Castle (No.2) [2012] EWCA Civ 1288, [2013] EMLR 4 )(cid:180)

Jun. 2019

21 June 2019

The so-ca(cid:79)(cid:79)ed (cid:179)Pa(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74) I(cid:81)c(cid:76)de(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:180) (cid:82)(cid:85) I(cid:81)c(cid:76)de(cid:81)(cid:87) T(cid:90)(cid:82) c(cid:75)a(cid:81)(cid:74)ed (cid:85)ad(cid:76)ca(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:92) a(cid:81)d on multiple occasions in these proceedings. The Court heard the shifting testimony at trial, but the distance travelled since it was first raised is extraordinary. This is relied upon by the C(cid:79)a(cid:76)(cid:80)a(cid:81)(cid:87) (cid:87)(cid:82) (cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:90) (cid:87)(cid:75)a(cid:87) M(cid:86) Hea(cid:85)d(cid:182)(cid:86) (cid:87)e(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:92) (a(cid:81)d M(cid:86) W(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:81)e(cid:92) He(cid:81)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:84)(cid:88)e(cid:86)(cid:182)(cid:86) (cid:87)e(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:92) (cid:76)(cid:81) support) cannot be relied upon. 21 June 2019

Dec. 2019

Claimant Timeline